Content that gets quoted, not just read
Your team publishes constantly, and AI engines summarize your topics without you. RankCited shows which of your pages the engines actually cite, why the rest get skipped, and what to change — before the next piece ships.
The new editorial question: will an engine quote this?
The research on what generative engines cite is unusually clear — the KDD 2024 GEO study measured it. Content with cited sources gained about 40% more visibility in AI answers; specific, dated statistics gained 37%; quotable expert claims gained 30%. Keyword-stuffed content lost visibility. Most content calendars still optimize for the old game.
RankCited turns those findings into an editorial workflow: a citation audit of your existing library (which pages engines quote, which they skip, and the structural reasons), quotability standards for new briefs, and prompt-level tracking so writers see their work show up in answers — the most motivating metric we''ve ever put in front of a content team.
And for the ceiling your own domain can''t break — engines trusting third-party sources over brand sites — our placements put your team''s ideas into the publications the answers are built from. Details under generative engine optimization and answer engine optimization.
Frequently asked questions
What makes content quotable to an AI engine?
Direct claims an engine can lift whole: a clear answer in the first screen, statistics with dates and sources, named expertise, and headings that mirror real questions. The engines skip content that makes them work — buried answers, vague assertions, walls of unsourced prose — however well it reads to humans.
Do we have to restructure everything we've published?
No — the audit ranks your library by citation potential and current performance, and usually a dozen pages account for most of the winnable ground. Those get restructured; the rest inherit the standards through your briefs going forward.
Does this replace our SEO workflow?
It extends it. The same pages compete in both games, and the quotability work — structure, sourcing, direct answers — helps classic rankings too, especially featured snippets. Your keyword process stays; a citation lens gets added to it.
Can writers see the effect of their own work?
Yes — prompt-level tracking shows which answers cite which pages, by author if you want. Teams tell us it changed how writers think about sourcing overnight. Nothing motivates a rewrite like watching a competitor get quoted for your topic.
What Our Clients Say
The audit found that our two most-cited pages were ones we'd considered retiring. We restructured twelve more using the same pattern — citations tripled in a quarter.
Maya R.
Head of Content, B2B SaaS
The quotability standards made our briefs sharper for humans too, which I didn't expect. Attribution tracking per author created some healthy competition.
Oliver D.
Content Director
From the blog
All articlesHow much of your library do engines actually cite?
The free citation audit maps your top pages against real AI answers in your topics. Most teams find a handful of quiet winners — and a pattern in everything else.
Audit my content — free